Basic HTML Version
181
Χ. Μασκαλίδης και συν. Απεικονιστικά χαρακτηριστικά των φλεβικών εμφράκτων με τη μαγνητική τομογραφία
with magnetic resonance venography is the diagnostic
method of choice, accelerates the selection of the
proper therapy and determines the prognosis. The
non specific clinical presentation, the great number of
etiologic factors and the indiscernible, in several cases,
imaging findings may prevent prompt and correct
diagnosis. This delay may have a serious impact on
the morbidity and mortality of these patients.
Keywords:
Venous infarct, MRI, MRV
Radiological Department of Thessaloniki “Papa-
georgiou“ Hospital
ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ
1. Osborn’s BRAIN: Imaging, Pathology, and Anatomy.
Venous Anatomy and Occlusions. AMIRSYS 2011;
24:1-25.
2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine,
4th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2009;
15:806-813.
3. Allroggen H, Abbott RJ. Classic diseases revisited.
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Postgrad Med J
2000; 76:12-15.
4. RodallecMH, KrainikA, FeydyAet al. Cerebral Venous
Thrombosis and Multidetector CT Angiography: Tips
and Tricks. RadioGraphics 2006; 26:S5-S18.
5. Leach JL, Fortuna RB, Jones BV, Gaskill – Shipley
MF.Venous Thrombosis: Current Techniques,
Spectrum of Findings, and Diagnost ic Pi tfal ls.
Radiographics 2006; 26:S19-S43.
6. Lee EJM. The Empty Delta Sign. Radiology 2002;
224:788-789.
7. Poon CS, Chang JK, Swarnkar A, Johnson MH,
Wasenko J. Radiologic Diagnosis of Cerebral
Venous Thrombosis: Pictorial Review. AJR 2007;
189:S64-S75.
8. Itrat A, Shoukat S, Kamal AK. Pathophysiology of
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis – An overview. J Pak
Med Assoc 2006; 56:506-508.
9. Kupfer SS, RubinDT. InflammatoryBowel Disease and
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis. Gastroenterology
& Hepatology 2006; 2:914-918.
10. Teksam M, Moharir M, deVeber G, Shroff M.
Frequency and Topographic Distribution of Brain
Lesions in Pediatric Cerebral Venous Thrombosis.
Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:1961-1965.
11. Rttrer C, Trittmacher S, Geriets T, Blaes F, Kaps
M, Stolz E. Reversible MR Imaging Abnormalities
fol lowing Cerebral Venous Thrombosis. Am J
Neuroradiol 2005; 26:607-613.
12. MullinsME,GrantPE,WangB,GonzalezRG,Schaefer
PW. Parenchymal Abnormalities Associated with
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: Assessment with
Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging. Am J Neuroradiol
2004; 25:1666-1675.
13. Forbes KPN, Pipe JG, Heiserman JE. Evidence for
Cytotoxic Edema in the Pathogenesis of Cerebral
Venous Infarction. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22:450-
455.
14. Teasdale E. Cerebral venous thrombosis: making the
most of imaging. J R Soc Med 2000; 93:234-237.
15. Vijay RKP. The Cord Sign. Radiology 2006; 240:299-
300.
16. Provenzale JM, Kranz PG. Dural Sinus Thrombosis:
Sources of Error in Image Interpretation. AJR 2011;
196:23-31.
17. Vogl TJ, Bergman C, Villringer A, Einhäupl K, Lissner
J, Felix R. Dural Sinus Thrombosis: Value of Venous
MR Angiography for Diagnosis and Follow-up. AJR
1994; 162:1191-1198.
18. IbdaihA,BoukobzaM,CrassardI,PorscherR,Bousser
M-G, Chabriat H. MRI of Clot in Cerebral Venous
Thrombosis: High Diagnostic Value of Susceptibility-
Weighted Images. Stroke 2006; 37:991-995.
19. Schaefer PW, Grant PE, Gonzalez RG. Diffusion-
weighted MR Imaging of the Brain. Radiology 2000;
217:331-345.
20. Yoshikawa T, Abe O, Tsuchiya K, Okubo T, Tobe K,
Masumoto T, Hayashi N, Mori H, Yamada H, Aoki S,
Ohtomo K. Diffusion – weighted magnetic resonance
imaging of dural sinus thrombosis. Neuradiology
2002; 44:481-488.
21. Ducreux D, Oppenheim C, Vandamme X, Dormont
D, Samson Y, Rancurel G, Cosnard G, Marsault C.
Diffusion–weightedImagingPatternsofBrainDamage
Associated with Cerebral Venous Thrombosis. Am J
Neuroradiol 2001; 22:261-268.
22. Krasnokutsky MV. Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A
Pontential Mimic of Primary Traumatic Brain Injury
in Infants. AJR 2011; 197:W503-W507.